WWF Admits “Sorrow” Over Human Rights Abuses

BuzzFeed News has journalists from all over the world bringing you reliable news and research findings. In order for this article to be a free one, be a member.

One of the world’s most powerful institutions has been known for years to provide funding for so-called human rights abusers but has repeatedly failed to address the issue, a lengthy report, which was later revealed Tuesday.

A BuzzFeed News investigation revealed for the first time in March 2019 how WWF, a non-partisan non-partisan with the panda logo, paid to park rangers accused of beatings, torture, torture, and mass murder. In response, the WWF launched an “independent inquiry” under the leadership of Navi Pillay, a former United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights.

A 160-page review, now published online, confirms problems revealed by BuzzFeed News in Nepal, Cameroon, the Republic of the Congo, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The group was reportedly banned by the COVID-19 epidemic from the areas where the violence took place.

The report found that the WWF has repeatedly failed to adhere to “its commitment to human rights” – promises that are not only required by law but also necessary to “protect the environment.”

Do you have a license for what people should know? Email authors at [email protected] or [email protected] Or you can reach out safely to tips.buzzfeed.com.

In a statement issued in response to the survey, WWF described the “deep and unwavering grief of the victims,” ​​and said that the abuse by zookeepers “intimidates us and contradicts all the principles we stand for.” The assistants recognized their shortcomings and accepted the advice, saying “we can and will do more.”

Pillay’s comments declined to be answered as senior executives, who BuzzFeed News found out about “running” a wild park in early January 2018, were to blame for the charity’s promotion.

In the Congo Basin, where the WWF played a “particularly weak” role in fulfilling its human rights record, the Wildlife Service did not properly investigate cases of murder, rape, and torture for fear that fellow statesmen might “commit atrocities in investigating past human rights violations,” the group found. There and elsewhere, the WWF provided technical and financial assistance to zookeepers, known as “conservationists,” even after learning about the same, dangerous – and, in some cases, after reviewing nonprofit reviews itself proved “dangerous and dangerous”. common ”reports of violence.

The report did not find a “legitimate way for WWF to raise awareness of war-torn violence” in Nepal, despite torture, rape, and murder from the early 2000s until last July, when park rangers allegedly beat up Indian youths and destroyed homes. ‘deralo. “The WWF needs to be aware of what is going on under the system”, in order to meet its human rights standards, the report said.

Photos by Frank Bienewald / Getty

Nepal’s River Chitwan National Park.

Overall, the WWF did not pay much attention to the allegations, failed to devise a way for the victims to complain, and provided a clear picture of its fight against crime in public speaking, the report found. “Unfortunately, the WWF’s achievements in implementing its policies have not been fully and consistently followed,” the report authors wrote.

WWF has supported the fight against wildfires for many years. Although local governments employ and pay park rangers who oversee game reserves and environmental protection, in several countries in Africa and Asia the WWF has provided much-needed funding for their operations. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online.

In a number of cases, BuzzFeed News found that WWF’s war on genocide came with casualties: people living in poor villages living near parks. At the time, WWF responded that many of BuzzFeed’s claims were “not in line with our understanding of the facts” – yet the donors changed their many of the freedoms once published.

In the US, the series encouraged double-digit research and the enactment of laws that would prevent the government from providing funding to national security agencies that pay for or support human rights abuses. This also prompted a shutdown by the Department of Home Affairs, under review by the Office of Accountability Office, and the investigation of government investigations in the UK and Germany.

The new review provides suggestions on how to help the organization improve its oversight, including enrolling other human rights experts, working hard before going to security services, signing human rights commitments with the WWF government and legal staff, and establishing appropriate grievance procedures. for Indigenous Indians to be able to express cruelty to others.

The review found that there is no “trial and coordination” at all WWF offices around the world “to address complaints of human rights violations” until 2018.

The group’s findings pointed directly to the issue: “The commitment to human rights must be recognized at the highest level possible within the organization,” the group wrote. Although all WWF offices in the Congo Basin are supervised by WWF International, staff at their headquarters in Gland, Switzerland is not overseeing the organization’s activities there.

WWF International has not yet given clear direction to the local office on how to fulfill its human rights promises. For example, there were no online customs on how to work with law enforcement and park rangers. As a result, each software office “was left alone to develop – or not – systems, training tools, how to assist administrators, and ways to deal with harassment cases.”

“Ultimately, the responsibility rests with WWF International and the WWF Network as a whole to ensure that allegations of human rights violations by eco-guards provided by WWF in funding and expertise are properly received,” the group wrote.

Photos by Ezequiel Becerra / Getty

WWF Executive Director Marco Lambertini

Last October BuzzFeed News revealed that Director General Marco Lambertini and Chief Operating Officer Dominic O’Neill analyzed a WWF-controlled report documenting the “speeding up” of violence by WWF-sponsored security guards in Cameroon. The report was sent to uploaders in January 2018 – more than a year before BuzzFeed News reported the same damage. However Pillay’s review did not say much whether WWF officials were responsible for the wrongdoing.

Instead the focus focused on the WWF crisis, with some offices collaborating with countries “that appear to be too small or under the control of WWF International,” although WWF International is responsible. These “obvious pitfalls of responsibility and accountability,” which lead to “problems and chaos” as well as attempts to “address human rights,” the group wrote.

The group did not find any agreement between WWF International and its allies on the issue of human rights or the rights of Indians.

The group also briefly criticized the WWF’s actions, saying it should “be extremely sensitive to the challenges it faces” and “be transparent in its response to human rights abuses in the services it provides.” In some cases, “it is clear that in order to avoid criticism, the WWF has decided not to publish the reports, to ignore what has been received, or to exaggerate its responses.”

An in-depth look at promoting the “good news” appears to have “brought about a culture” in which program offices “have been unwilling to share or advance their knowledge of all human rights abuses because of complaints of threats provided or offensive to governments,” the report said. “WWF in all its forms should be transparent in and out of its challenges in promoting the protection and respect of human rights. Most importantly, it must be clear on how it is going to address these issues, or its inefficiencies.”

The report was immediately criticized by prominent figures who said they did not fully agree with the charity’s treatment of the Indians. Stephen Corry, director of the Survival International, a national rights activist, said the report was “in line with the WWF’s response to the crackdown on” government officials. A spokesman for the Rainforest Foundation UK said the report “failed to take responsibility for the” WWF offenses “or to sincerely apologize to many victims of human rights abuses in their name.”

The Forest Peoples Program, a human rights organization that has reported violence at the WWF, said the report highlighted the need for all wildlife support agencies to take care of themselves.

“The human rights abuses that our people and communities are highlighted in this report reflect the needs that are coming across the region, not just WWF,” said Helen Tugendhat, program director at Forest Peoples Program. “We urge other environmental organizations and funders to read this report carefully and review and refine their practices.”

Comments are closed.